Should You Buy Long-Term-Care Insurance in Your 50s?
A reader whose mother died from Alzheimer's asks whether long-term-care insurance makes sense in their 50s. The answer hinges on family history and finances.
For Americans in their 50s with a parent who suffered from Alzheimer's disease, the question of long-term-care insurance carries particular urgency. One MarketWatch reader shared that by the time their mother died, her long-term-care insurer had paid out nearly $600,000 in benefits — a figure that underscores both the potential value of such policies and the staggering cost of dementia-related care.
Family medical history is widely regarded as one of the most significant factors when evaluating whether to purchase long-term-care coverage. A parent diagnosed with Alzheimer's can raise a person's own statistical risk, making the calculus around insurance more pressing than it might be for someone without that hereditary exposure.
Read more HELOC on a Paid-Off Rental: Is Now a Smart Move? →
Timing is a central consideration. Premiums for long-term-care policies are generally lower when purchased in one's 50s than when deferred to later decades, and applicants are more likely to qualify medically before age-related conditions complicate underwriting. Waiting too long can result in higher costs or outright denial of coverage.
The financial landscape for long-term-care insurance has shifted considerably in recent years, with several major insurers exiting the market and remaining carriers raising premiums on existing policyholders. Hybrid products that combine life insurance or annuities with long-term-care benefits have emerged as alternatives, offering more predictable cost structures for buyers wary of traditional standalone policies.
Ultimately, the decision involves weighing personal assets, income, risk tolerance, and family health history against premium costs and benefit structures. Continue reading at MarketWatch.com
