Estate Planning Dilemma: Splitting a Family Business Between Two Sons
A 64-year-old business owner weighs whether to leave 70% of the family firm to the son who works there, raising questions about fairness and estate planning.
A 64-year-old entrepreneur is wrestling with how to divide ownership of a family business between two adult sons — one who works in the firm and one who does not — according to a reader question published by MarketWatch. The parent is considering leaving the working son a 70% stake while the other son receives the remaining 30%, but reservations about the non-working son's marital stability are adding another layer of complexity to the decision.
The scenario reflects a broader challenge faced by family business owners across the country: how to balance equitable inheritance with the practical needs of a going concern. Giving equal shares to heirs who have unequal involvement can create management disputes, while an uneven split risks damaging sibling relationships and perceptions of favoritism.
Read more Ages 60 to 63: A Critical Window for Retirement Tax and Healthcare Planning →
Concerns about a child's marriage are not uncommon in estate planning conversations. A divorce could potentially expose a business interest held by a married heir to division proceedings, depending on state law and whether prenuptial agreements or trust structures are in place. Estate attorneys frequently recommend trusts, buy-sell agreements, and other legal instruments to insulate business assets from such scenarios.
Financial planners generally advise separating the concepts of "equal" and "fair" when drafting an estate plan for a family-owned business. A child who has invested years building the company may have a stronger operational claim, while a child outside the business might be compensated through other assets — life insurance proceeds, real estate, or liquid investments — to achieve overall parity in the estate.
The question underscores why succession planning is widely considered one of the most emotionally and legally intricate aspects of estate management, particularly for privately held companies where valuation, control, and family dynamics all intersect. Continue reading at MarketWatch.com.
